LETTER : Creeping peril of land mines
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Christopher Bellamy's report on Britain's increasing isolation in opposing a ban on land mines (19 March) highlights the Government's view that "anti-personnel mines have a role as defensive weapons provided their positions are accurately recorded". This view presupposes that mines will stay put once placed, which is not always the case.
Torrential rain in Mozambique this month has flooded a wide area including the heavily mined Manhica district. Many of the 200,000 people affected have lost their homes and belongings. Once the waters subside, some may face the added danger of mines displaced by the floods from known minefields.
Only a total ban offers long-term hope of significantly reducing the daily toll of suffering anti-personnel mines inflict.
Martin Cottingham
Christian Aid
London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments