LETTER : Cost of favouring first-time buyers

Eric Longley
Tuesday 08 August 1995 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Eric Longley

Sir: Colin Brown ("First-time buyers may get tax break", 7 August) grossly underestimates the cost of restoring Miras to 25 per cent of interest, from its present level of 15 per cent for all borrowers. The overall cost of restoring Miras to its previous 25 per cent level would be nearer pounds 2bn than the pounds 900m suggested.

Increasing Miras to 25 per cent for first-time home-buyers would cost the Government a great deal of goodwill with other home-buyers who would be excluded. It will also cost the Exchequer not only the tax forgone on the extra relief but also the extra costs of administering a two-tier system.

Commentators cannot ask the Government to increase Miras on the one hand and reduce the basic rate of tax (every reduction of lp costs approximately pounds 2bn in tax revenue lost) on the other. If we are to have both an increase in the rate of Miras and a decrease in the basic rate of tax, the question must be asked, where is the money to come from?

In the past, reduced tax levels have led to increased compliance measures; in short, every reduction in the basic rate of tax has lead to an increase in the Inland Revenue's powers. Surely your commentators do not want to reduce the level of the basic rate of tax, and increase Miras to such an extent that the British public has no rights of resistance or privacy to the ever inquisitive Inspector of the Inland Revenue?

Yours sincerely,

Eric Longley

Corporate Tax Department

Chantrey Vellacott

London WC1

7 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in