Letter: Corporate killers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You report (2 October) on proposals to introduce a new offence of corporate killing.
Until a few years ago serious railway accidents were followed within a few days by an internal inquiry and within a few weeks by a public inquiry taken by an inspecting officer of railways. There were no lawyers present, witnesses were invariably open and the whole process was focused on finding the cause and recommending any necessary improvements. Prosecutions were rare.
The process has changed out of all recognition. The police seek to prosecute, encouraged by the media seeking scapegoats. Once a prosecution is under way the investigative process is delayed and complicated by witnesses seeking to defend themselves or their employers from legal retribution. Meanwhile the daily death toll on the roads exceeds that of the Southall rail crash.
A rail crash at Watford on 8 August 1996 will not come before the courts until April 1998. Until the criminal processes are completed the public debate about causes and remedies cannot take place. Under previous procedures inquiries would have been completed and any recommendations could be in course of implementation. The defensive culture surrounding railway accidents serves as a platform for politicians and provides an income for lawyers. It does nothing to illuminate the causes or speed the implementation of remedial action.
Professor W P BRADSHAW
Senior Visiting Research Fellow
Centre for Socio-Legal Studies
University of Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments