Letter: Controlled parking on residential streets
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your article about the introduction of controlled parking presents a one-sided picture.
Your writer specifically mentions Richmond, but controlled parking in this borough is nothing new - residents' parking zones have been in operation for 21 years. When first introduced, the zones were welcomed by residents because they curbed parking in our streets by commuters, allowing us to park close to our homes.
Car ownership in 1990 was 19.7 million and forecasts show a growth to between 23.8 and 26 million by the year 2000, and up to 34 million to 2020. In the borough of Richmond in 1981, 21 per cent of households had two or more cars. In 1992, this figure had risen to 34 per cent. These figures explain why there is a problem.
Zones have been extended and introduced in other parts of the borough, but they are never imposed on residents. When, after a painstaking consultation exercise, a majority in a street or area vote against the introduction of a zone, it is not introduced. This has happened a number of times in the past, although requests to opt in are sometimes made at a later date by residents who rejected a proposed scheme originally.
Yours faithfully,
ALISON CORNISH
Chairman
RAYMOND HART
Vice-Chairman
Planning & Transport Committee
Richmond upon Thames
Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments