Letter: Consumer council ruled out of disputes

Ms Ruth Evans
Thursday 14 July 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article 'Rail watchdogs without bite' (13 July), on the ongoing rail dispute, states that the National Consumer Council (NCC) does not consider industrial disputes as part of its brief.

Indeed, you go as far as suggesting that this amounts to 'passivity' on our part.

However, it is not an issue of what we 'consider' to be within our remit. The role of the NCC was clearly set down in 1975 when we were set up by the then Labour government.

Our Memorandum and Articles of Association state specifically that matters relating to employment issues are outside our terms of reference.

Yours faithfully,

RUTH EVANS

Director

National Consumer Council

London, SW1

14 July

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in