Letter: Confusion over the millennium
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Thank you for your clear exposition (Technoquest, 3 June) of the firm arithmetical reasons for the 21st century and third millennium to begin on 1 January 2001.
When Julius Caesar initiated the Julian calendar in 46BC, he found it necessary to declare that that year should have 445 days, which earned for it the title of the Year of Confusion. Those who wish for something to celebrate on 1 January 2000 could hail the start of the Second Year of Confusion.
Not only will it be the year widely but mistakenly believed to be the start of the millennium, it will also be the year in which much of the world's computer software, short-sightedly written to accept dates only up to 1999, will cause widespread commercial and other disasters.
Dr J M WILLIAMS
Chichester,
West Sussex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments