Letter: Concern over the probation service
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: We write as a group of senior clinicians involved in the assessment and treatment of mentally disordered offenders in Inner London, Middlesex, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire. Over the years we have established good working relationships with the probation service. In cases referred to us, we have found their prior knowledge of offenders, their familiarity with the offender's background and their links with other agencies involved with the offender to be invaluable.
We are regularly involved with probation officers in providing joint supervision for patients discharged from hospital care. In addition, we are involved with probation officers in the joint supervision of offenders under the terms of probation orders with a condition of psychiatric treatment.
We write to you because we are most concerned about the proposals now being advanced by the Home Office to reduce the necessary social work training for probation officers. We anticipate that this will lead to a diminution in the quality of care available through the probation service. We also anticipate that this reduced level of care will increase the risk of further offending when supervision is undertaken by less highly trained and less experienced probation officers.
It appears that there is little contact between the Home Office, from which these proposals originate, and the Department of Health, which is busily introducing a variety of programmes to reinforce the supervision available to the vulnerable mentally disordered. We therefore urge that the proposals to abolish formalised social work training for probation officers are reconsidered.
Yours faithfully,
Kevin Murray, Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist; Ian Treasaden, Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist; Chris Cordess, Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist; Paul Chesterman, Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist; Sylvia Bercu, Locum Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist
North West Thames Regional
Forensic Psychiatry Service
Southall,
Middlesex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments