Letter: Compensation for loss of young lives

Ms Louise Christian
Tuesday 11 April 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: While the families of those who died in the Marchioness disaster are grateful for your endorsement of our call for a statutory right to a public inquiry in major incident cases, there was one error in your comment piece ("Obstacles to justice compounded grief", 8 April), which we wish to correct. You stated that the way now lay open for claims for compensation by the families. Such claims have already been made and except for a handful of cases have been settled. In seeking the inquest and the verdict of unlawful killing, no one was motivated by any consideration relating to a compensation claim.

Families claiming for compensation have, under the law on fatal accidents as it stands, received hardly anything over and above the cost of the funeral. Many people have lost jobs, homes and relationships due to bereavement grief in the aftermath of the disaster, but English law does not recognise this in the absence of actual financial dependency at the time of death. When young unmarried people die in circumstances of gross negligence as here, death comes cheap and the boat owners and their insurance companies suffer little in the way of financial penalties. It is not only in the field of criminal law that the Marchioness families have been let down by the system.

Yours faithfully,

LOUISE CHRISTIAN

Christian Fisher Solicitors

London, WC1

10 April

The writer is the solicitor acting for 43 families whose relatives died in the `Marchioness' disaster.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in