Letter: Community chemists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your article on the distribution of community pharmacies (24 February) did not address the key issue: not so much a question of how many pharmacies dispense what number of prescriptions, but rather how many pharmacies in what locations are required to ensure reasonable access for all to a full pharmaceutical service?
Today's pharmaceutical services extend beyond the core role of dispensing prescriptions and bring to a community the pharmacist's skills as a health professional who is an expert on medicines and their safe and effective use, and who is, above all, accessible to the public. The value of this service is being recognised by a professional allowance for pharmacists, who have hitherto been remunerated only for the number of prescriptions dispensed.
Both the National Audit Office report and the Public Accounts Committee response to it recognise the importance of safeguarding access to pharmaceutical services. The Department of Health has acknowledged that any mechanism to reduce the number of pharmacies dispensing NHS prescriptions in the areas where the department thinks there are too many must not deprive other places of their only pharmacy.
This surely means safeguarding the existence of community pharmacies in the shopping, suburban and housing estate areas as well as close to doctors' practices, so that a visit to pharmacy remains a part of day-to-day life and people have a choice of pharmacy.
Yours faithfully,
JOHN FERGUSON
Secretary & Registrar
Royal Pharmaceutical Society of
Great Britain
London, SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments