LETTER : Commonwealth versus Europe
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Bernard Noble
Sir: As one long a servant of international justice, I am appalled by the manner in which discussion of the Grand Banks fisheries dispute is, in Britain, being hijacked into the maelstrom of the EU debate. Certainly, it contains fascinating issues for the constitutional lawyer, but the piling of one extreme hypothesis on another is inimical to common sense.
I wonder, more particularly, what useful purpose can be served by dramatising the Queen's dual position, as Rupert A. H. Barnes has done (Letters, 14 March). Mr Barnes could not expect the royal tie, once embroiled in the debate, to be dealt with solely on his own literalist terms or invoked against the EU without needlessly destructive results.
The limits of its efficacy would soon be apparent, and that would simply strengthen the hands of the many in Canada who see no point in retaining it; the worst course for those who value it would be to help them prove it anachronistic.
Mr Barnes says that the UK and Canada "are entirely autonomous politically but are otherwise inseparable".What is there in this "otherwise" that can possibly ease a politico-legal dispute? Can it really be, as he implies, a disposition to treat our European treaty-partners as "foreigners with whom we have mere trade relations"?
Yours faithfully,
BERNARD NOBLE
Deputy-Registrar (retd)
International Court of Justice
The Hague, Netherlands
14 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments