Letter: Climbers can see warnings in clouds

David Pedgley
Sunday 02 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Peter Gillman's article (17 December) following the tragic death of Jane Thomas in the Cairngorms and the subsequent correspondence have emphasised that adequate clothing and equipment are essential for safety on the mountains. The article also rightly draws attention to fitness and ability to navigate but there is no mention of the need to watch continually for changes in the weather.

Jane and her fellow climber experienced fierce winds and resulting blizzard that developed earlier than forecast. But severe weather is almost always preceded for several hours by warning signs in the clouds: changes in cloud type, height and motion. Hillwalkers and climbers are well advised to recognise the signs and take action to reduce risks - part of the 'danger management' mentioned by Peter Gillman.

It may be that the two climbers were so absorbed in their ascent (it took longer than intended) that they forgot to keep an eye on the sky. Perhaps they had no choice, once started, but to go on to the summit plateau rather than retreat. Their task at the start would then have been to weigh up the chances of a slower ascent against an earlier storm. Were there no signs of an earlier storm at the start of the ascent? Some mountaineers may wish to go 'prepared for anything'. That does not seem to be good danger management. Is it not wiser to plan the day according to the forecast but change the plan when the clouds so dictate?

Yours sincerely,

DAVID PEDGLEY

Crowmarsh, Oxfordshire

30 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in