Letter: Class sizes for better learning
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Just over a month ago David Forrester, an under-secretary at the Department for Education, argued that larger class sizes could lead to improved standards in schools (report, 6 September).
This week Professor Neville Bennett's team at the University of Exeter has released the results of a survey which shows that parents and headteachers believe that large class sizes are damaging children's education ('Increasing class size 'damages a child's education' ', 14 October). This comes hard on the heels of work undertaken by London University's Institute of Education, which indicated that the achievement of children at the age of seven was the single most important factor which affected their performance at GCSE.
A parent's comment recorded by the Exeter researchers that 'any half-wit should realise that increasing class size is detrimental to a child's education' appeals to common sense, but we should no longer have to rely solely on common sense. A large- scale study into the effect of class size on children's learning is long overdue, as is a willingness on the part of policy makers and politicians, to pay heed to all that is known about how we learn and about how learning may best be supported throughout life.
It makes little sense to some of us that high-achieving 17- and 18- year-olds are in classes often half or even a third of the size familiar to most of the nation's four- and five-year-olds.
Yours faithfully, JOHN ABBOTT Director The Education 2000 Trust Letchworth Garden City, Hertfordshire 14 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments