Letter: Claims of 'uproar' over council tax unfounded
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE evidence for the 'uproar' ('Uproar predicted over council tax', 13 September) appears to lie in this department's provision for a possible 1 million council tax appeals. In a country of 20 million homes, an appeals rate of 5 per cent (from which the 1 million is derived) can hardly be said to be distressingly high.
Some people - those at the margins of valuation bands, for example - appeal in the hope of paying a lower bill; others may appeal out of confusion about the nature of their valuation. Articles such as this risk adding to the latter through omission and misrepresentation.
Rosie Waterhouse implies that valuations ought to be based on current actual values rather than a single valuation date. Since actual values change almost every day such an approach would be impossible.
You claim that in areas where house prices are low 'a hard- pressed family on a run-down council estate will be paying about as much as a well-off family in a spacious-semi'. This assumes that the two properties have been placed in the same valuation band. But while the council property is quite likely to have been placed in the lowest band, the 'spacious semi' would have had to be valued at less than pounds 40,000 in order to join it.
A hard-pressed family is very likely to qualify for an income- related rebate. A family on income support would pay nothing. Where an area is one of low property values, the local council will receive more grant for all spending up to its recommended level. So there is no foundation for the article's assertions.
Michael Howard
Secretary of State for the Environment
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments