Letter: City body will benefit London
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE REPORT on the possible extension of the Bridge House Trust was mean and extremely ill-informed ('Corporation is attacked over charity secrecy', 12 December). Thanks to good management, the historic trust fund administered by the Corporation of London to maintain the City's four bridges now has more money than it needs for this purpose.
We have discussed with the Charity Commission how best to channel the funds for the benefit of London. The result is likely to be a new source of charitable funding for good works in London as a whole. That surely is an objective for support, not carping criticism.
It is totally untrue that these charitable funds will be maintained for the 'well-off areas of the capital'. Over the years the City Corporation has provided London with services and amenities at no cost to the people of London or the nation. Examples include Epping Forest, Burnham Beeches and Hampstead Heath, and the wholesale food markets etc.
The article also criticised the corporation for avoiding local authority reform. It is not the corporation that has avoided local government reform but successive governments that have seen our running of the Square Mile as a model entirely suited to the City.
You criticise our democratic processes, yet it is ironic that everywhere else in the country local authorities are in place for four years, wheareas here in the City the councillors are all up for re-election every single year.
C Douglas Woodward
Chief Commoner
Corporation of London
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments