Letter: Churchill's wartime rights and wrongs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Professor Donald Cameron Watt's review (16 January) of John Charmley's 'revisionist' study of Churchill is welcome.
In March 1943, at the age of 17, my late twin brother and I volunteered for service with the Royal Navy. Like thousands of others, we felt that the destruction of Nazism was an end in itself.
It is possible to believe that fighting Hitler was right in 1939 but wrong in 1941, although this smacks of inconsistency. Others maintain that going to war was wrong all along. This is the essence of appeasement that Churchill fought in vain in the mid-Thirties.
Perhaps Dr Charmley will give a clear answer to a simple question: was it right, or was it wrong, for Britain to go to war with Nazi Germany in the first place?
Yours faithfully,
NORRIS McWHIRTER
London, SW7
18 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments