LETTER : Chirac's big risk
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Dr Christopher Williams
Sir: Further French testing raises a crucial question. How in the future can we prevent a single national leader posing a threat to global security against global democratic will?
Chirac's actions stem from political self-interest, not concern for global safety. President Mitterrand had suspended tests, so they are not imperative. As other nations do not now need primitive "does it go bang" testing, the main effect on French science is to advertise its inadequacies.
People are not ignorant of the need to take risks to improve security, but risk must be shared. The post-Chirac era must be marked by an end to risk-taking that enhances the security of some at the expense of the security of others.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Williams
Environmental Victims Project
Global Security Programme
University of Cambridge
Cambridge
2 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments