Letter: Children still loved after transfusions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Having read 'Battles without blood' (28 July), I wish to set the record straight on one oft-quoted misapprehension.
Neither I nor any of my colleagues know of any occasion when a Jehovah's Witness has rejected a child after an unwanted blood transfusion. Such children are cared for with the same love and devotion as Christian parents lavish on any child who has been assaulted; which is indeed how Jehovah's Witnesses view this, happily rare, situation.
Yours faithfully,
J. W. A. BRACE
Deputy Hospital Information Co-ordinator
Watch Tower
London, NW7
28 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments