Letter: Child support must avoid 'formula fetishism'

The Earl Russell
Monday 27 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Congratulations on your leader on the Child Support Act. The financial circumstances of divorces are as various as divorces themselves, and to suppose one formula can fit them all is formula fetishism. If there is to be a formula, it must allow an element of discretion. If this point is not conceded, the whole notion of a formula will have to be abandoned.

While the Government was making a statement on this subject, it should have commented on your story (20 December) that more than 11,000 lone parents have given up claiming Income Support to avoid involvement with the Child Support Agency. What has happened to these people?

Yours sincerely,

RUSSELL

House of Lords

London, SW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in