Letter: Child's rights, or parent's duty to smack
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In the opening paragraph of your leading article you envisage a parent who finds his daughter near the main road she was forbidden to approach. The parent strikes the child, but this is no assault.
The authority of the parent over his child should be recognised. The greater experience of the parent gives him the right to demand that his children obey him, even if they don't understand why the command is given.
The parent, who dearly loves his daughter, must mix his relief at her safety with the righteous indignation that his informed command was ignored. It was his care for the girl which led him to give the instruction. A mild smack directs a child in the way he must go. Wanton abuse or heavy- handed "justice" from uncaring parents fall into a different category.
MARTIN GOMPERTZ
Nottingham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments