Letter: Chief Buthelezi: not 'mad, bad or extremely dangerous', but much maligned
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: 'Everyone knows that the chief is mad, bad and extremely dangerous', writes John Carlin ('Dangerous myth of the Zulu warrior' 24 June).
Earlier in the same article, Mr Carlin asks: 'Why are whites flocking to Inkatha?' We must presume it is because they believe Chief Buthelezi is the best bet for the future of South Africa even though they know he is 'mad, bad and extremely dangerous'.
Your correspondent describes Chief Buthelezi as the 'greatest threat to South African democracy'. South African democracy has always been a sickly plant, and one might with equal validity state that democracy is the greatest threat to South Africa - if only one could agree on the meaning of democracy.
Chief Buthelezi is the only leader to my knowledge who has commissioned constitutional experts to produce a multi-racial constitution for any part of South Africa. This was specifically for Natal and Kwa Zulu, to take the place of the Provincial government of Natal and Zululand. Sadly, the National government was at that time concentrating all power in its hands at the expense of the Provinces. The Commission's report, though widely accepted by all races in Natal and Kwa Zulu, was placed in the Pretoria waste-paper basket.
Chief Buthelezi, with consistency, presses still for a significant place for provincial government. Cynics may suggest this is because he would rather be a bull in a small kraal, than not a bull at all. Realists would suggest that South Africa, being a very large country with such diversity of peoples, needs an effective decentralised government at provincial level, and that a federal state might be appropriate.
Whatever the conclusion will be, the most difficult problem is the application of democracy in a country that has shown little respect for it in the past, and sees little to commend it in the rest of the world at this time. Sadly, I found nothing in your correspondent's article to help resolve this problem.
Sincerely,
PETER BURTWELL
Salisbury
24 June
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments