Letter: Charities: the"contract culture",ethics and raising funds

David Harker
Thursday 18 May 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr David Harker

Sir: I was saddened by Polly Toynbee's tirade against charities ("Charities don't need a contracting role", 17 May).

Her outright attack on charities contracting with the state is misplaced. The growth of what is known as the "contract culture" has had a mixed impact on the charity sector. In some cases it has been damaging, particularly when small voluntary groups have been bullied into punitive agreements by aggressive local authority purchasing managers. But much of it has been positive, bringing charities and voluntary groups as partners into the planning and delivery of social care. As such it has been a move away from the "nanny state", to the enabling state which seeks to provide people with a choice of services provided by a variety of organisations.

The issue of charities using money raised from the public to subsidise services funded by local authorities is amusingly, but inaccurately portrayed as seeking a donation to the local council. Charities are acutely aware of the dangers implicit in mixing funding in this way. Used with skill this can lead to a situation where the local authority can get the service it wants and the charity can achieve its objectives.

Finally, it is inaccurate to suggest that charities with government contracts do not campaign. Many of the most effective campaigning charities are also major service providers. The credibility and the knowledge they gain from running innovative high-quality services makes their campaigns well-informed and effective.

Yours faithfully,

DAVID HARKER

Deputy Chief Executive

Sense, National Deafblind and

Rubella Association

London, N4

17 May

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in