Letter: Charities pay a high price for professionals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In his article about the Salvation Army's loss of more than pounds 6m ('Salvation Army acts against four top officers over missing millions', 9 April), Steve Boggan suggests (by connecting competence with salaries) that this was partly due to the fact that the funds were being administered by persons who have no more than a limited grasp on financial matters.
The article highlights a problem that charities are faced with daily, namely that of how much of their budget to spend on administration.
Employing professionals is a costly business, and fees quickly mount up. When it comes to deciding whether to pay an outside professional for an hour's work or an in-house care worker for a week's work, most charities would choose the latter.
Many charities already have to buy-in some professional support services, and they could very easily surround themselves with even more highly salaried experts, but at what price? The general public would soon notice an array of Jaguars and BMWs and would start asking questions.
There will always be instances where charities have to pay for outside agencies to act on their behalf, but the extent to which this occurs is a matter for each charity to decide in accordance with their constitution.
In the case of the Salvation Army, one wonders whether the use of outside professionals would have helped. After all, we have seen some spectacular City frauds.
Yours sincerely,
P. EMERY
Preston
Lancashire
9 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments