Letter: Causes and cures for poverty

Dr Jamie Gough
Monday 01 September 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Letter: Causes and cures for poverty

Sir: Polly Toynbee's article (28 August) on ending poverty shares two misunderstandings which inform most recent contributions to the debate on "social exclusion": that poverty can be addressed without changing the structures of the mainstream economy, and that it can be resolved from the top down.

Toynbee argues for the speedy funding of already successful programmes. Fine. But programmes targeted solely on the poorest cannot end poverty. The increase in poverty in the last twenty years has been produced by the decentralisation and fragmentation of wage bargaining, the outlawing of most effective trade union action, the deliberate creation of high unemployment to lower wages and impose greater managerial discipline, increased freedom of movement of capital, deregulation of employment, and an overarching strategy of cost-cutting. These conditions, which New Labour is committed to retaining, cannot but reproduce greater inequality.

Nor will poverty be addressed primarily by pressure on the Government of liberal business and middle-class opinion. "Ordinary people", including the poorest, have to fight against the effects of neoliberalism and devise measures to replace it. But this requires an end to the trade union and public order laws which are the other major inheritance from Thatcherism.

Dr JAMIE GOUGH

Division of Geography and Environmental Management

University of Northumbria

Newcastle upon Tyne

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in