LETTER:Cash-limiting plans will hurt the lawyers' `patients'

Nicholas Wood
Friday 13 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Nicholas Wood Sir: Your leading article of 12 January gives an entirely erroneous impression of the working of the legal aid system, and of the way lawyers are remunerated under it. The system provides for the vetting of lawyers' proposals for special expenditure, the assessment of lawyers' claims for fees (including disallowances for wastage), the reporting of abuses and the discharge of legal aid certificates in appropriate cases - for example, at the instance of a judge or an opposing party in litigation. To anyon e who doubts this, I commend the eminently readable article on the subject in volume 27 (2) of Halsbury's Laws of England (4th Edition), which is available in most well-stocked public libraries. Generations of lawyers have had to work under these discipl ines, having to face financial reality all the time.

Thus, the imagery of the profligate lawyer prescribing expensive remedies unchecked to line his own pocket, while no doubt amusing copy, does nothing to educate the average reader. On the contrary, it misleads. Yours faithfully, NICHOLAS WOOD Five Paper Buildings London, EC4

12 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in