Letter: Care for smokers: doctors' priorities, patients' choices
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I agree with the sentiments in your leading article 'The fag-end of medical care?' (18 August), which analyses the moral arguments in the tragic case of the late Harry Elphick. As a vascular surgeon in the busiest central London hospital, I can assure you that the doctors, nurses and technicians in our unit do not make moral judgements of the kind implied here.
We recognise heavy smoking as an important cause of stroke, heart attack and limb gangrene, but would never deny urgent or indeed non-urgent treatment to our patients living under a threat to their lives or limbs because of blocked arteries as a result of heavy smoking.
You will be aware that a significant number of our patients are homeless and/or living in poverty. We would never add injury to insult by refusing urgent surgery or other measures to save life or limb. They are informed of the risks of smoking but never turned down for treatment.
I believe I speak for most of my colleagues in the country, and particularly those in busy inner-city hospitals. Priority is given to the most seriously at risk - irrespective of cause.
Yours sincerely,
M. ADISESHIAH
Consultant Vascular Surgeon
University College Hospital
London, WC1
18 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments