Letter: Can Nigeria be pulled back from the brink?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Karl Maier gives an excellent account of the precarious situation evolving in Nigeria ('An African giant on the edge of the abyss', 12 August). However, Mr Maier's analysis of recent developments falls short by failing to take account of the open scepticism in Nigeria that has, since 1986, accompanied General Babangida's transition programme to democratic government.
Such scepticism extends beyond past and recent actions of the current administration, and rests much more firmly with public ambivalence towards the degree of trust and hope Nigerians feel able to vest in either civilian or military administrations. The public response, of relief, towards the overthrow of President Shagari's civilian administration (1979-83) and General Buhari's regime (1983-85) are but two cases in point in a litany of administrations that have scarred Nigeria since 1960.
It is clear that Nigeria's programme towards democratic government, the cornerstone of which was grounded on two lacklustre and artificially created parties, has become an expensive disaster that increases economic, social and political uncertainties in Nigeria, threatens the stability of other countries in the region, and worsens the precarious situation in Liberia. The attempt by the Nigeria's Social Democratic Party (SDP) to rally support in Western capitals marginalises its leadership and may actually arouse latent nationalist sentiment in support of a mortally wounded regime. Perhaps a better, and more productive, course of action would be for the SDP to devote its energies to a pragmatic power-sharing accord with the Babangida administration before it proposes to step down on 27 August.
By such means the Social Democratic Party will not only tap into the rich vein of ambivalence Nigerians exhibit towards both civilian and military administrations, but also lend support and give leadership to the struggling local and state civilian arms of government that are already in place.
Yours faithfully,
LAURIE C. JOSHUA
Watford, Hertfordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments