LETTER: Calling the CSA to account

Mr Richard Oppenheimer
Thursday 19 October 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Richard Oppenheimer

Sir: The response by Tony Ward, director of operations at the Child Support Agency (Letters, 16 October), to Polly Toynbee's article is misleading.

Last year, as a result of its own actions, the CSA collected pounds 64m of maintenance for offset against state funds, at a cost of pounds 192.4m. The remaining pounds 128m was revenue brought forward from the old Liable Relatives Unit and for which the CSA can claim no credit. By contrast, in its last year, the Liable Relatives Unit offset pounds 313m of maintenance against state funds, at a cost of pounds 61m.

Of the 500,000 cases which the CSA handled last year, more than three- quarters were cleared with the absent parent being asked for pounds 2.30 a week or less, and because of the nature of the formula many people who were previously paying at least something are now effectively paying nothing. That is why the number of people receiving maintenance has now fallen to an all-time low.

Ms Toynbee is right to ask if the CSA is on the verge of collapse. It is doomed to failure on financial grounds alone. The arithmetic of the CSA's assessment formula dictates that it will never be able to offset as much maintenance against state funds as the system it replaced. The simple truth is that, over three years, replacing the Liable Relatives Unit with the CSA has delivered a loss to the taxpayer of pounds 1.1bn.

Yours faithfully,

Richard Oppenheimer

Network Against the

Child Support Act

Milton Keynes

18 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in