Letter: Buildings that fall in Havana
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The building that almost flattened Jonathan Glancey in Havana ('Walls came tumbling down', 20 October) collapsed because people had been removing its wooden scaffolding piece by piece to fuel their cooking fires. There is very little electricity in Cuba now and thus little refrigeration, so it is vital to boil water and cook food thoroughly. But there is very little gas, either, so the Habaneros have been reduced to building fires in their courtyards.
Dominic Gold (letter, 28 October) made sensible suggestions for the involvement of the British architectural community in Havana's restoration. Might not Great Britain follow the lead of other foreign governments and organisations and select an 18th-century palace to sponsor? One possible use for it could be as a museum of the British occupation of Havana from 1762-63, a stirring story of brilliant British military and naval planning and Spanish and Cuban courage and tenacity. The hundreds of fascinating artefacts in existence, as well as a sizeable collection of paintings and prints relating to the event, could then be housed under one roof. As Dominic Gold suggests, British architects could become involved in the building's restoration.
The British departed from Havana in 1763, having broken the stranglehold of the Spanish trade monopoly. Might not the British in 1993, 230 years later, help the Cubans to avoid the dual stranglehold of American embargo and American culture?
Yours faithfully,
JULIET BARCLAY
London, W12
29 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments