Letter: Bugging: we cannot simply trust police

Derek Sands
Thursday 16 January 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Chief constables claim that under the Police Bill they could not lawfully authorise the bugging of conversations between solicitors and clients who are not discussing corrupt acts (letter, 15 January). They are wrong.

As it stands, the Police Bill does not prevent the police invading the privacy of ordinary people who are quite properly seeking legal advice. This is because bugging equipment by its nature is indiscriminate. All clients visiting a solicitor whose office is under surveillance would have their conversations taped in the course of a surveillance operation.

Chief constables also suggest incorrectly that there are constitutional difficulties in making bugging and other covert surveillance techniques subject to prior judicial authority. It is the long-established role of our judiciary to balance the interests of the individual with those of the state, and this is clearly recognised in legislation such as the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.

DEREK SANDS

Chairman, Courts and Legal Services Committee

The Law Society

London WC2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in