LETTER: Buck stops here - or does it?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I WAS surprised that Peter Hennessy in his article about how hard ministers work, made no mention of executive agencies ("Are they still fit to govern", 15 October). Since he was such an enthusiastic supporter of the Next Steps agency game in the past, it seems odd that he failed to mention agencies having any beneficial effect on the burden of ministers' work.
Or is it? Does his general finding that, despite occasional Whitehall tinkering, ministers continue to involve themselves in an inordinate amount of detail, not simply confirm the view held by most civil servants from the outset, that the division between "policy" and "operations" was always a silly one? A view which, by coincidence, was startlingly exemplified by the Home Office's Prison Service cavortings.
Chris Sladen
London W5
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments