Letter: BSE animal experiments
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: BSE animal experiments
I AM writing as a person who contributed towards the research by Dr Steven Watley presented at the BSE inquiry last week, to pose a few questions about the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food's research into BSE.
Dr Watley's research has given support to the hypothesis that BSE may be triggered by organophosphate exposure. Will Maff be starting their investigations with totally clean animals? Will they, for example, have taken into account the inevitable exposure to pesticide residues present in conventional cattle rations? Have they considered using certified organic cattle for their investigations? Will control animals remain as pure controls, or will they be subjected to vaccination, de-worming and the host of other invasive procedures carried out routinely in intensive agro-farming?
An obvious observation is that the "experiment" has already been performed on UK farms over the past decade. Perhaps Maff would be better employed in performing an exhaustive epidemiological study, comparing every aspect of the farming practices of BSE-affected versus BSE-free herds. Please note the use of the word "affected" rather than "infected"; the latter assumption is at best only a working hypothesis and nowhere near proven. A toxicological explanation for BSE is not only possible but, in my opinion, probable.
JOANNA WHEATLEY
Maidenhead,
Berkshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments