Letter: British National Party's campaign on the Isle of Dogs

Mr Michael Newland
Sunday 03 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your correspondents (letters, 31 March) who criticise John Torode's article about the British National Party on the Isle of Dogs have little to offer but a minor reworking of last year's left-wing Easter Parade of evasions and half- truths.

Councillor Derek Beackon won the September by-election on an unusually high turnout for a local poll, yet it is suggested that the result was in some way unfair or unrepresentative because Mr Beackon did not receive votes from a majority of those living on the island. Your trade union correspondents should be advised that British elections work that way. The Labour Party has, for instance, never managed to win even a majority of the votes cast in any general election, despite being in government many times - not even in 1945.

The issue on the Isle of Dogs is a simple one. The residents wish to see local resources used for their community. The chattering classes, who now make policy in all three major parties, have other ideas. The islanders' needs are a low priority in their great scheme to build a society in Britain that no one wants - especially themselves.

If the great architects of the left had their children sleeping in the living room, like many islanders, while local housing is allocated to people from the other side of the world, and attracted epithets such as 'Nazis' if they objected, they would sing from a very different hymn book.

Yours faithfully,

MICHAEL NEWLAND

Press Officer

British National Party

Welling, Kent

31 March

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in