Letter: British aid - with strings attached
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your article on the Public Accounts Committee's inquiry into British aid for the Pergau dam project ('Major approved pounds 234m aid for 'wasteful' dam project', 18 January) highlights an issue of major concern to development charities: that political and commercial considerations often outweigh developmental and environmental factors in the allocation of British aid resources.
It also represents a diversion of scarce resources when British aid is set to decline in real terms over the next few years.
At a time when the number of people living in absolute poverty is increasing, it is disappointing that funds equivalent to 12 per cent of the total British aid budget are used to fund a single project that is 'a very bad buy', according to the National Audit Office report, and which runs counter to senior Overseas Development Agency and World Bank advice.
The pounds 234m spent on the project is equivalent to eight times the amount the Government spends on joint funding projects with development charities; it is more than the estimated sum the Government spends on aid that meets poor peoples' basic needs; and it is more than twice the amount of British overseas aid for education.
The ODA itself argues that British aid is used to 'reduce suffering, poverty and deprivation, and to improve the quality of life for poor people'. Yet the Pergau project highlights the increasing commercialisation of British aid. How will the Government ensure that poverty-reduction criteria override other considerations in the future?
Yours sincerely,
MARTIN GRIFFITHS
Director
ActionAid
London, N19
18 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments