Letter: Boutros-Ghali's vision for the UN

Mr Gerry Pocock
Thursday 30 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your correspondent may be right that Boutros Boutros-Ghali is 'turning the Security Council' against himself ('UN's dream leader heads for disaster', 27 July), by which he probably means the five permanent members who tend to regard the UN as their own property.

One most notable feature of Mr Boutros-Ghali's report on peace- keeping last month - made at the request of the Security Council summit in January - is the emphasis on the role and resources of the UN itself as an entity in its own right, not simply as an instrument of the big powers.

Apart from a UN military force under the direction of the Security Council but with the Secretary- General as Commander in Chief, he emphasised the importance of the General Assembly, in which all member states have a voice

and vote, and of non-governmental agencies, including public opinion.

This concept of the UN - an independent role and a broad public base - is surely more appropriate to today's world than a big power instrument, which was probably the most that was possible in 1945.

As far as I'm concerned, Mr Boutros-Ghali deserves our support, even if he is a bit clumsy in his dealings with ambassadors.

Yours sincerely,

GERRY POCOCK

Beccles, Suffolk

28 July

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in