Letter: Border disputes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE "new world order" seems to rest on a dogma never openly proclaimed - that borders must never be changed, even if the states defined by them have proved unviable. Thus condemnation of the Serb use of force is followed by a request in Parliament for an assurance that the Government will not support independence for Kosovo, or its union with Albania. Robin Cook offers instant assurance: "There is no map for a greater Croatia, a greater Serbia, or a greater Albania."
In other words, the Kosovo Albanians, like the Serbs and Croats of Bosnia, must for ever remain part of a state they detest. There must be an "end to violence" and a "negotiated settlement".
The policy of all borders being externally sacred is an artificial and doomed attempt to freeze the course of history. It is particularly absurd in the case of Yugoslavia, since the borders concerned were those of provinces, not independent states.
I believe this policy rests principally on the experience of the 1938 Munich agreement, where borders were redrawn in order to prevent war, and this did not prevent war. For all this government's obsession with being modern, we appear to be going into the next century with a foreign policy stance conditioned by the experience of the Second World War, as the recent spate of rhetoric over Iraq showed.
Those people denied self-determination in the post-war settlements will not go away. Neither repression nor negotiation solves ethnic problems; they are solved only by moving populations or changing borders. Since the latter is obviously the more humane, why must it never even be discussed?
JOHN EDMONDSON
Glastonbury,
Somerset
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments