Letter: Blueprint for controversy

Mr Alan Powers
Thursday 11 February 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: My gratitude to Jonathan Glancey for drawing attention to the current proposals for altering the house by Mendelsohn and Chermayeff in Old Church Street, Chelsea (10 February) does not extend to his unflattering and journalistic account of Serge Chermayeff's early career. His use of the word 'functionalist' to describe both Mendelsohn and Foster reverts to the jargon of the Twenties and further confuses the issue.

Your readers would have been helped to make up their own minds if Sir Norman Foster's designs had been illustrated. Among eminent architects who have seen the proposals, Sir Denys Lasdun has supported our objection to putting new windows into the garden elevations and Lord Esher has written that it would be 'a terrible pity' to add glass wings.

One need only look at the neighbouring house in Old Church Street, designed by Walter Gropius and Maxwell Fry at the same time as the Cohen house, and subsequently altered by two Royal Academician architects, both former assistants of Maxwell Fry, to see that creative intervention in classics of the modern movement is a dangerous game.

Yours faithfully,

ALAN POWERS

Hon. Secretary

The Twentieth Century Society

London, SW4

10 February

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in