Letter: Blasphemy and the democratic right of dissent
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: There is a sound jurisprudential reason why the blasphemy law should be abolished. If God exists, then certainly a blasphemy is a blasphemy. If God does not exist, then a blasphemy is simply an empty expression.
God's existence is not beyond all reasonable doubt, and it is at the very least unwise to impose a law whose grounding is less solid than the normal requirements for a successful criminal conviction; accordingly any blasphemy law is at best otiose, and at worst a theocratic atavism.
Yours faithfully,
STEPHEN R. GOULD
London, SW5
11 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments