Letter: Bishops are not fat cats
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CLARE GARNER describes the financing of church of England bishops as a "cost to the public purse" ("Cash row bishops plead poverty", 18 January). Not so. Not a penny of the running costs of the Church of England comes from the taxpayer. Support for the bishops is funded from the Church's historic assets managed by the Church Commissioners.
The Bishops of the Established Church have to meet particularly large expectations in national and civic life, over and above their heavy ecclesiastical duties. In relation to the demands upon them and compared with other major players in public life, the logistical and staff support they receive is in my view slender, often barely adequate. If anybody were to become a bishop hoping for a comfortable life, they'd be in for a nasty shock.
Dr Andrew Purkis
Lambeth Palace, London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments