Letter: Bill of Rights

Mr John Wadham
Tuesday 20 February 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr John Wadham

Sir: In the account of the need for a Freedom of Information Act ("How free can we get with their information?", 19 February), Nicholas Timmins mentions the other important change in the Constitution - the creation of a Bill of Rights - which is also urgently required. Unfortunately, many people, including politicians, believe that this second demand can be met by simply incorporating the European Convention of Human Rights into domestic law.

While incorporation may be a necessary first step towards creating a proper Bill of Rights for this country, it is insufficient in itself. Despite the fact that changing standards in Europe are to some extent reflected in the decisions that the judges make, there are limits to this and to the extent to which the convention can be used to protect rights in the 21st century.

These are not arguments against incorporating the convention immediately. Nevertheless, the convention has a number of rights missing from its text. There is, for instance, no right to information from public bodies; and, immigrants, asylum seekers and those being extradited under the convention are given very little protection.

Apart from wholesale omissions of important rights, there are also considerable gaps and limitations in the rights that are provided by the convention. Now is the time to begin the discussion of the details of the Bill of Rights that we want to complement the rights that are contained in the European convention.

Yours faithfully,

John Wadham

Director

Liberty

London, SE1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in