Letter: Beware the Tory MP and his racist gaffe- or was it?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Polly Toynbee is right that those who claim to deplore the language of equality actually deplore the idea of equality, but she makes only a vague allusion to the principles of modern linguistics which underpin her argument.
According to Ferdinand de Saussure's structuralist theory of linguistics, the way people use words is indivisible from their meaning. There cannot be a difference in form without a difference in meaning.
The English language is less susceptible to inherently sexist usage than those languages which have a gender system, but it does have a colourful and varied range of derogatory terms for women and foreigners, as Ms Toynbee mentioned: "wogs", "bimbos", "tarts", "nig-nogs" and so on. There are far more ways to insult a woman or a foreigner than there are to insult a white male.
ALEXANDER HOFMANN
(A white male)
St Andrews, Fife
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments