Letter: Better protection for archaeological sites
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your report (' pounds 1.5m bronzes for museum', 27 January) that the Icklingham Roman temple bronzes will eventually be inherited by the British Museum is very welcome. However, this case has shown that the British government has no powers to recover objects which were illegally looted from a scheduled archaeological site and illegally exported. We have had to rely on the determination of the landowner, John Browning, to fight the case as an individual in the American courts and to win our right of access to these pieces of our past.
But beyond this exceptional case, the outlook is bleak. The Government refuses to ratify a Unesco convention on illicit trade in cultural properties. Objects looted from historic sites all over the world constantly pass through London's sale rooms - good for trade figures but bad for the national image. Less dramatic finds, which are just as important for understanding our past, are removed in their thousands from our own historic landscape; only a small percentage are properly recorded before they are sold or lost, and the information they represent is destroyed completely. The legal protection for objects in the ground is limited and enforcement is often regarded as low
priority.
Rescue wants better protection for archaeological sites and the objects which are part of them, and urges immediate ratification of the Unesco convention as one step in this process.
Yours faithfully,
JUDITH PLOUVIEZ
Secretary, Rescue
The British Archaeological Trust
Hertford
27 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments