LETTER:Better borrowing for Railtrack
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr John Perry
Sir: One option is available for the future of Railtrack that Christian Wolmar did not cover ("What track is the Labour Party travelling on?", 5 February). Railtrack could have a new life as a public corporation with commercial freedom within the public sector. Its borrowing would count against the PSBR, but not against the alternative measure of fiscal stance, the General Government Financial Deficit. The same option is open to the Post Office and, indeed, to council housing, which could be reconstituted as local housing corporations.
The GGFD is already the most widely used measure in the rest of Europe: this is why the French railway system is able to invest so heavily. The GGFD allows borrowing for new investment (as against consumption) that can be financed by corporations from their income, to be undertaken on a commercial basis. It allows those parts of the commercial sector that can operate commercially to stand apart from services such as hospitals and schools that cannot make charges. Its adoption would allow any new public finance to be concentrated in those areas where private finance cannot work.
Yours sincerely,
John Perry
Director of Policy
Chartered Institute of Housing
Coventry
6 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments