Letter: Best hospitals for breast cancer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I must correct one seriously misleading statement in your story about the recently published breast cancer guideline (13 August).
The incorrect statement was that outcomes are better when women are treated at hospitals with throughputs of 1,000 breast cancer patients per year. In fact, there is no evidence that treatment in large hospitals leads to better outcomes, although women managed by surgeons who treat fewer than 30 cases per year have been shown to fare worse. The new recommendations suggest that each specialist breast cancer team should manage at least 100 new cases per year. The figure in your article was ten times higher than it should have been.
Dr ARABELLA MELVILLE
Kirk Hammerton,
North Yorkshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments