Letter: Belated recognition for Great Pyramid relics

Mrs M. Elizabeth Porteous
Monday 10 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I am gratified to learn from an article ('Sacred Egyptian relics said to lie under the Needle', 6 December) and subsequent correspondence - of which I have only recently been made aware - that artefacts found by my great-grandfather, John Dixon, in the Great Pyramid are of great significance and interest.

On the death of my father in 1970, my brother, sister and I inherited several items from John Dixon, nearly all of which related to the part he played in the transport of 'Cleopatra's Needle' from Alexandria to London in 1877-78. Also included with these items was the 'cigar box' containing relics from the Great Pyramid. Having no knowledge of the importance of these items, it seemed that the proper action would be to present them to authorities on Egyptology who could assess their worth.

Therefore, in September 1972, I presented them to the British Museum and received written acknowledgment and thanks. No further comment was made, so I assumed that, after study and cataloguing, they were found to be of no remarkable significance.

Imagine my surprise, therefore, on learning 'they are the only artefacts known to have come from the Great Pyramid' (Adrian G. Gilbert, letter, 29 December). It is distressing to discover that an important find made by my great-grandfather in 1872 appears to have been treated with some contempt by the very institution which many lay people, like myself, regard as the ultimate authority on Egyptian antiquities. Could the reason be that John Dixon was a distinguished civil engineer rather than a distinguished archaeologist? I hope not.

In any event, I hope that when examination of these rediscovered artefacts is completed that they may be placed on public display and perhaps even loaned to the Egyptian authorities for display in the Queen's Chamber of the Great Pyramid next to the shaft in which they were discovered.

Yours faithfully,

M. E. PORTEOUS

Hounslow, Middlesex

5 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in