Letter: Behind the image of Mountbatten
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The image of India's last Viceroy, Lord Mountbatten, faded globally long before Jan McGirk discovered it had ("Image of last Viceroy fades under new order", 31 March).
In his book Eminent Churchillians, Andrew Roberts, the historian and biographer, demolishes the image of Lord Mountbatten as a military planner and describes him as "a mendacious intellectually limited hustler, whose negligence and incompetence resulted in many unnecessary deaths - the numbers of which increased exponentially as his meteoric career progressed".
Roberts's main criticism of Mountbatten is directed at his role in the hasty, unplanned and unsupervised partitioning of India:
Any population transfers that were ... demanded could have been properly supervised and protected. Then - and only then - the country could have been partitioned and the two countries declared independent. In not following this common-sense sequence - indeed in taking the steps in almost the reverse order, with such horrific consequences - Mountbatten deserved to be court-martialled on his return to London.
As India celebrates the 50th anniversary of its independence in August this year, it should demand from the British government a public inquiry into the circumstances leading to its partition in 1947 and especially the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in the biggest transfers of population in history.
M RIAZ HASAN
Harrow,
Middlesex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments