Letter: Beef-on-the-bone peril
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Beef-on-the-bone peril
JACK CUNNINGHAM was absolutely right to protect the public from the dangers of BSE-infected bone marrow. It is most unfortunate that the powerful meat and farming lobbies are attempting to overturn this wise precaution ("Farmers hail court ruling over beef on bone case", 22 April), and unfortunate too that the public are largely kept in the dark about the case to be made for the ban.
There are actually very good scientific grounds for this ban:
The transmissible spongiform encephalopathies show a concentration of infectivity in the nervous and lymphoid tissue, including the bone marrow.
Infectivity is found in the nerves and lymphoid tissue at an early stage in the infection, before it is detectable in the brain. Infected bone marrow could be present in the cattle aged under 30 months currently being eaten.
When beef is cooked on the bone, any infectivity will be spread throughout the meat and the gravy - it is not sufficient to avoid eating the marrow itself.
The absurdly low level of risk bandied about now has almost certainly come from the Ministry of Agriculture (Maff) via the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee, and Maff has a record of consistently making unjustifiably optimistic assumptions of risk. The calculations are very difficult, and in truth nobody really knows.
The right time to lift the ban on beef-on-the-bone would be when a test for BSE, not available at present, was able to demonstrate with confidence that our food was no longer contaminated by a potentially lethal and currently incurable disease.
ADRIAN HOLME
London N7
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments