Letter: Battle of Heathrow
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Polly Toynbee's article (13th October) on the planning inquiry for Terminal 5 at Heathrow makes much of the environmental impact and the role of tourists but ignores business travellers.
I run a small consulting company designing theatre buildings. With a team of 35 people, we work internationally - 43 countries in the last twenty years. We and our clients need good, frequent and reliable airline connections. We are not a wealthy mega-corporation with deep pockets.
Ms Toynbee argues that air travel could be rationed, with the rich who wish to travel frequently buying more rations from the poor. That system is ludicrous in a business context.
Business travellers are already penalised by high fares and ever-increasing taxes on travel. I personally travel over 300,000 miles per annum on business, a figure I long to reduce. Perhaps the more rapid introduction of video conferencing could reduce airline travel?
DAVID T STAPLES
London N8
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments