Letter: Balance sheet all on the debit side as 30,000 British miners see their jobs destroyed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Everyone in the energy industry is deeply affected by the plight of the miners, their families and the communities hit by the announcement from British Coal. But that announcement itself referred to 'heavily subsidised nuclear power, which has a guaranteed market for all its output'. Not true, on either count.
The levy is not a subsidy indefinitely supporting Nuclear Electric's operations. It is primarily a means of providing for the inherited liabilities tied to the first-generation Magnox stations, built in the wake of the Suez crisis to ensure that Britain had diversity and balance in its energy supplies. What is more, the levy will come down in real terms each year, from its present pounds 1.2bn to pounds 750m in 1997/98, when it is due to cease.
Nuclear Electric does not have a guaranteed market for its output. If we are not commercial, we fail. But we are succeeding. We are on track to be generating operating profits within three years and we are building our first pressurised water reactor at Sizewell B ahead of time and within budget. Similar PWRs are already producing electricity more cheaply than fossil-fuelled plants around the world, both for public- and private-sector utilities.
This is the shape for the future - a future where nuclear and coal, operating commercially, are natural partners, because nuclear power stations do not produce carbon dioxide or acid rain emissions. A UK energy future without coal is unthinkable. A future for coal without nuclear providing an environmental balance is impossible.
Yours faithfully,
ROBERT HAWLEY
Chief Executive
Nuclear Electric
Gloucester
14 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments