Letter: Bad decisions on the 'Braer'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The Braer's captain asked to be put back on board two hours after he had abandoned the ship. It now appears that he requested the airlift prematurely, since there was a chance of being pulled to safety by the Star Sirius. The
captain was, though, hardly in the position to make an accurate judgement.
The coastguard rescue services were. They should have been
allowed to weigh the potential loss of three lives on board (with hindsight, unlikely) against the almost certain loss of livelihood of all
the people employed in fishing, salmon farming and the holiday industry along the destroyed coast. For the sake of three sailors' safety, a whole community of people, animals, birds and fish was abandoned.
But nobody can really blame the coastguard. They are obliged to put immediately threatened human life first, at all costs. In that, they have certainly succeeded.
Yours faithfully,
M. TURNER
Ashwell, Hertfordshire
6 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments