Letter: Australia alone must decide
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In response to Brian Parkyn and James Allen (letters, 1 April), it can only be hoped that the views they wish to present as paradigms for the selection of the Australian head of state remain their views alone. While perhaps being the sentiments of those in Britain who desire a continuation of British colonial links with Australia, they are not indications of the desires of most Australians.
The concept of the British 'motherland' is insignificant and alienating for the many Australians whose heritage is not British. In this multi- and cross-cultural context, a British- based monarch for Australia is not only irrelevant, but, for certain cultures, also distasteful.
In the context of modern Western political life, the concept of the monarchy is even more anachronistic. Indeed, following the Australian constitutional amendment of 1986, the Queen of England and the British Parliament have no powers or influence in the affairs of the Australian parliament.
This, together with a situation in which the Queen of England and her heir apparent, the Prince of Wales, are not Australian citizens, or resident in Australia, provides positive support for removal of the British-based monarchy. As for an Australian-based monarch, can Mr Parkyn suggest any Australian person or family that should be appropriately posited into this unfairly privileged and outmoded position?
Whether Australia should become a republic or not (and it will, sooner rather than later) is a matter for the Australian people to decide in their own interest, and not according to the dictates of the British 'motherland'.
Can the British finally accept that Australia is not British territory, and that Australians would prefer to debate their political future according to their own desires?
Yours sincerely,
EDDY JOKOVICH
Director
Australian Regional Media
Sydney, Australia
1 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments